Tag Archives: Arts

After Nightfall Season 2, Episode 4

We are officially halfway through the season. Have we all taken a deep breath after last night’s episode? Good. Because holy hell, was that dramatic.

Let’s begin with the elephant in the room. Colin. Specifically, his encounter with Quintin and Dave. Oh Colin, why?

“I wish it was you instead of Troy!”

The entire scene leading up to that explosion, I was suspecting Colin may say something to that effect. But all the same I was going “Don’t say it. Don’t say it.” And he said it. I don’t blame Quintin for reacting the way he did. And I never thought I’d see the day, but I’m with Dave when he says “What the fuck is wrong with you?”
This isn’t like the unforgivable scene from The Cursed Child where something very similar is said between a parent and child and it’s completely out of nowhere and out of character. I don’t like what Colin says to his son, but this scene actually works. Even leaving aside the impressive performances, this argument is justified, and Quintin isn’t exactly innocent either. He doesn’t deserve to hear what he hears from Colin, but he fans the flames.
At acting school, one of the best teachers/directors/performers in the business told my class, If something is well written, none of the characters are completely right. What does this mean in terms of our scene? Well, obviously Colin is very wrong for wishing Quintin had been murdered and saying it to his face. But Quintin is wrong for a) saying he wishes Colin wasn’t his father and b) continuing to work with Dave. And of course Dave is a criminal, but in this case he’s actually the voice of reason. I’m glad this scene was added because Colin is far from a saint. He’s a very grief-stricken man, but he’s completely absorbed in his own world. He seems to have forgotten he’s not the only one suffering because of Troy. Yes, emotions are all over the place but come on, Colin.
Let’s just forget for a moment that either Quintin or Dave could have killed Troy. Dave rightly points out Quintin has lost his brother. Troy was more than just Colin’s son. And this is something we’ve seen already with Justine (and has he even talked to Isobel about it?), which is further cemented when Colin goes into the house only to find Brenda.

It seems I was correct in my theory that Brenda is a fraud. Yay. Colin is completely justified in his anger towards her, because scammers like Brenda do exist especially in high-profile cases. They take advantage of desperate families so it was great to see her thrown out the way she was. Full props to actor Felicity Burke for selling the character so well.
But in saying that, I feel for Justine here (although I’m at a loss to why she was seemingly open to Brenda’s claims while dismissing her husband’s!). She’s trying to find something to cling to, anything at all, and Colin’s sole focus is finding Troy’s killer. Again, a completely understandable goal. But at the expense of neglecting your family’s feelings? That’s where the shades of grey come in. Good to know Colin isn’t going to be portrayed as some kind of Messiah figure.

Ok, ok, I’ve spent enough time on the first three minutes and forty seconds. Moving on to the next act. Zara is out for a jog and runs into Ursula and Viv. And do I detect the hints of a spark between the local tarot reader and the new sergeant? We know Zara recently ended a relationship, we know she’s of the LGBTQIA community, and there’s been no mention of Ursula’s sexuality (not that this has any bearing on whether the character is good or not). Could this be leading to something more? Though ethically, it would be a tricky subject. Conflict of interest and all.

Meanwhile we see Ryan has returned (somehow injury-free despite Leanne saying Dave nearly killed him) and wants Leanne to join him in his new life. But Leanne is afraid for hers if she left Dave. Definitely true for many people in violent relationships. Though we’ve never seen Leanne in any kind of physical danger from Dave, it’s not too much of a stretch to imagine him going there. We’ve seen his temper in action. I may loathe cheaters, both in the real and fictional world, but I have to admit, there was a twinge of sympathy for her here. This storyline is definitely going to have an explosive climax.

At the hospital, Faye’s claim that she doesn’t remember her attack isn’t fooling anybody, least of all Angela. But Kobie now knows what Oscar has done. I’m not sure Oscar is going to get out of this season alive now. No joke. Also, that baby was adorable.

On the way to school the next day, Hayden confronts Wesley over his injuries. Wesley claims it was a bike accident, but Hayden doesn’t believe this. Since Wesley hasn’t been at school since the accident, the day Troy was murdered, it’s obvious he thinks they’re from Troy defending himself.
Nice and realistic touch, but Wesley has only just been introduced this season. He was never even mentioned throughout season 1. To have Wesley be the killer would be a stretch of Elastigirl proportions, plus Wayne Tunks has gone on the record saying the killer played Season 1 knowing they did it. My hope is that if this is a red herring, and I’m 110% sure it is, Wesley serves a greater purpose than just someone for Hayden to suspect. I don’t believe his wounds were from stacking it on his bike at all. I still think Kobie was involved in that because of the blood soaked shirt from Season 1.

Finally, we’re back at conversion camp where Nathan’s parents have been brought in for family counselling. Nathan’s told he’s nowhere near being cured, but if I had to hazard a guess, it seems Pat might not be as big on this idea as Ed. She’s clearly upset at her son’s sexuality, but her reaction when Nathan was abducted in Season 1 adds some weight to the idea that she isn’t entirely without reason. She shows concern when Nathan tells them about the shock therapy and Daisy’s situation, and the fact that Peter and Melinda don’t immediately deny this should raise a red flag. But then again, if she’s ok to send Nathan to conversion therapy at all there’s not a lot she can do to redeem herself. As for Ed, he’s a lost cause. I don’t care if he turns out to be Jesus. Nothing is ever going to make me like his character.
And if anybody is interested as to why I’m so fixated on Nathan and his storyline, I’ll reveal something without naming names. Nathan reminds me of someone very dear to me. My best friend in high school, who I’m still very close with, was very nearly sent to one of these horrendous places after his parents discovered he was gay by going through his phone. Thankfully he wasn’t, but it was a terrifying two weeks of not being able to contact him in any way. So that’s why Nathan evokes such strong reactions with me.

This episode feels different. There’s a spark in terms of the drama, and a shift that things are only going to get more crazy from here. The fire has been lit. Let’s see how much it will burn. Though if I’m honest, the only thing I want to see burn down is that camp.

After Nightfall. Questions, theories, suspects, clues!

I’ve done it. I’ve rewatched the entire first season, and the first three episodes of After Nightfall. Ahead of  Season 2 Episode 4 airing tomorrow, here’s a detailed look at our suspects, questions that need to be answered, theories on what’s to come, and clues you may have missed!

Season 1

Episode 1

  • As the episode opens, we see Quintin, Dave and Ryan appear to be in the area near where Troy was found. Is this a coincidence, or could they have just dumped Troy’s body?
  • In Kobie’s first appearance, Kobie is seen breaking into a car, but there’s no blood on his shirt. His timeline of that night is clearly unfinished.
  • As Ursula reads the tarot cards, Viv’s reaction indicates she knows something has happened.  Possibly she sees Troy for the first time? I freely admit to knowing literally nothing about tarot, but I’m sure the Tower card is significant.

Episode 2

  • The pathologist says Troy was killed around five hours earlier, and he’d been moved. So that would put Dave’s gang in the right place at the right time.
  • When Dave is on the phone, Leanne seems nervous. Dave only says “My nephew’s dead,” and Leanne responds ‘Troy?” Red flag or red herring? How did she immediately know it was Troy and not Quintin? However, it’s possible she knew Quintin was the one on the phone because he’s so deeply involved in Dave’s drug ring. Still, her reaction to Dave’s rage can’t be coincidental.
  • Kobie is seen washing blood from his shirt. It can’t be Troy’s, because he was strangled. And it wasn’t on his shirt when we first saw him, so whoever’s it was, it happened after his first scene when he broke into the car. And my money’s on Wesley. He’s the only character who’s had an injury consistent with that sort of bleeding, and with the timeline of Troy’s funeral being in the same week, that adds up.
  • Oscar is looking at the news sites of Troy’s death. Why would he be looking at these? He’s clearly concerned that his disturbing predatory behaviour will be discovered during any kind of investigation. Could there be more than just that? While it might be too obvious that Oscar did it, I’m not quite ready to strike him off the suspect list yet.

Episode 3

  • The iPad needs to be explained at some point. As I said before, why would Troy leave it there if it was so important? There was a huge focus on the iPad in Season 1. If this adds up to nothing, I’m not going to be very happy. Troy led his father to it, so there has to be something there.
  • Why does Isobel have a stash of money in her room and where did she get that much?
  • Kobie wasn’t surprised that Troy was dead. Clearly, he knew already. Did he come across the body or did he have something to do with it? I’d like to think not because that would be far too simple an explanation. And if it did turn out to be Kobie, I think a lot of us would feel ripped off. There has to be a better twist than that.
  • Oscar says the news site said Troy’s body was found without his bag or phone. This doesn’t seem like the kind of thing journalists are typically able to report, especially in the first few hours. How did he know this?
  • Viv knows Oscar isn’t to be trusted. She might not be able to say much, but she’s very perceptive.

Episode 4

  • What exactly happened between Nathan and Troy? Why did that relationship end? Was Nathan worried about his parents finding out? Still doesn’t seem enough reason to kill Troy over.
  • When did Kobie get hold of Troy’s phone and why? Was it before or after he was dead? I’d assume after, since he obviously knew what happened.
  • Troy was angry that Hayden gave the tip off about Dave’s drug circle. That explains why Hayden and Troy weren’t speaking that day. Probably found out while walking to school together.
  • Why does Isobel film Ryan and Leanne? How did she know about the affair? But we may have an answer as to where she got her money from. I think she’s been swiping it from Dave. As she searches the shed, she says “Where’s the money gone?” And technical question, how on earth did they not see her filming them?

Episode 5

  • Could Nathan’s parents have had something to do with Troy’s death? If they’re willing to pack their son off to a torture camp anything’s possible. Also, strangulation indicates that Troy’s murder may have been on impulse rather than premeditation. We’ve heard almost nothing from Pat Kelty so far, but she was very quick to say Nathan wasn’t involved.
  • In the final scene, you can see Troy speak to Viv. I’m no lip reader but I can tell he uses the words “…killed me”. Viv’s reaction suggests that Troy may very well have just revealed his killer to her. But I’m a little skeptical, because she really can’t communicate sufficiently with anyone. If I was killed, came back as a ghost and could communicate with people, you better believe I’d be snitching first thing.

Episode 6

  • It may open with a dream, but we can start piecing the timeline together. Troy and Hayden walked to school together that morning, where he and Hayden likely had an argument over Hayden’s tip off. That’s probably how Troy ended up alone, and likely not long before he was killed.
  • If I had to take an educated guess, I’d say Isobel stole the phone to send the video to Dave, so he wouldn’t recognise the number. But why she did this at all is a complete mystery.
  • Why did Kobie bury Troy’s phone where the body was found?
  • Oscar’s horrified reaction to what he’s done to Faye indicates that he’s not as violent as we’ve been led to believe. But he certainly has a temper, and a tendency to lash out.
  • Troy’s killer also killed Simon, who seemed to have some sort of corrupt arrangement with them. Also, we know the killer is old enough to drive.

Season 2

Episode 1

  • Zara is tough as nails, and carrying a lot of anger. Why is this?
  • What’s Wesley’s role in the story and how did he get injured? I suspect Kobie, but I could be wrong.
  • We know Viv lost a child because Colin mentioned it in episode 5. I think Kate will be important later on.
  • Colin’s aunt Narelle is likely going to play a role in finding Troy’s killer, since she shares the family gift.
  • This is likely just a coincidence, but funeral attendee Harper Smith shares the same last name as Yardley, Nathan’s love interest. Hmmm.
  • Troy’s strength is building. Does this mean he’ll soon be able to talk to Colin?
  • If Troy’s killer is at the funeral, that REALLY cuts down the suspect list (I think we can safely assume the new characters of Season 2 weren’t involved!) leaving us with Colin, Justine, Isobel, Quintin, Viv, Dave, Margie, Pat, Kobie, Hayden, Grace, Xavier, Ursula. Apparently Oscar was meant to make an appearance but the actor was unavailable.
    I’ll leave a list of the suspects down below and whether or not I think they could have done it, but this is huge.

Episode 2

  • I’d love to see more about Zara and what makes her tick. She’s one of the most interesting characters in Season 2, and that’s saying a lot.
  • Will Maddie be able to tell Kobie what really happened to Faye? Or is she too young and traumatised by what she saw?
  • For reasons I discussed last week, I firmly believe Brenda is a fraud.
  • Now that Hayden and Colin are working together, what’s going to happen? Is Colin going to wind up in trouble with the law for taking matters into his own hands?

Episode 3

  • Brad is off Dave’s payroll. And does his comment “I’ll be forced to tell (Zara) what you’ve been up to” mean more than just the drug dealing? Either way, Dave no longer has a shield to hide behind. This can’t end well.
  • Why does Angela have this drinking problem? And what exactly is the nature of her relationship with her ex-husband?
  • We see a softer side to Zara in this episode. Could her tough exterior merely be a coverup? And she’s a fan of tarot, so that could be a help or a hindrance.
  • I believe there’s going to be some kind of revolt/escape attempt at the camp. Nathan should have no shortage of allies to help him, and what he’s already gone through is motivation enough, let alone his new roommate Daisy.
  • Oscar is seeming less likely to have killed Troy. He sure is a coward, but his terror and denial seemed genuine. However, he’s a skilled liar.
  • Faye has woken up. What does she remember?

Now, we must ask the question,

Who Killed Troy McLeavey?

  • We know it can’t be Colin because he can see Troy, as the creators have confirmed.
  • It can’t be Viv because she can see Troy and her severe disability makes it impossible.
  • I highly doubt Isobel was involved because she’s so small. How could she possibly overpower Troy? Also, we know Troy’s killer can drive, and while Isobel may be a devious little brat, I highly doubt she can pull that one off.
  • I don’t think it was Justine because of how distraught she is.
  • As for Quintin, he’s done nothing to really alleviate my suspicion. He’s always been in trouble, according to Justine, and he’s not afraid to get his hands dirty. Could he have killed Troy? He certainly has the physical ability, the means and the opportunity. But he’s still Troy’s brother, so it’s not so simple.
  • Ursula I’m honestly not sure about but from what we’ve seen of her, why would she do something that would rip her family apart?
  • Hayden appears to be off the list. He loved Troy too much and the texts he sent indicate he wasn’t aware Troy was dead. Also, Colin is working with him, so Hayden seems unlikely.
  • Unlikely to be Grace or Xavier. Grace found the body and why would Xavier suggest a tryst in the area where he dumped a body if he’d done it?
  • It can’t be Faye. She’s pregnant.
  • I REALLY hope it’s not Kobie because that would be an infuriatingly obvious solution, and so far the series has strongly hinted he wasn’t actively involved.
  • It can’t be Nathan. He’s stuck at the camp, and honestly he just seems too gentle for that kind of violence. I know, I know, I’m biased because he’s my favourite character. But still!
  • It can’t be Angela. She recognised Troy when she arrived at the crime scene.
  • It can’t have been Simon. He was murdered by Troy’s killer and that would make for a phenomenally stupid way out.
  • What motivation could Margie have for killing her son’s boyfriend? I never thought she was likely but appearances can be deceiving.
  • Were the Keltys involved? They had a motivation, and the cutaway to Pat at Troy’s funeral when Narelle said Troy has unfinished business can’t mean nothing. Especially with what they’ve done to Nathan.
  • Dave’s gang seem to have been in the area around the time Troy’s body was abandoned there.
  • Brad might have been involved. We know he’s corrupt, and he seems genuinely concerned about Zara’s vow to change the local force.
  • Leanne and Ryan have been acting very suspiciously throughout the series. They are firmly on the list of suspects. Is it possible Troy caught them together and he had to be silenced?

So, what do you think? Did I miss anything? Who do you think killed Troy? The answers are on the way, but there’s still time to speculate. Let me know in the comments, and watch out for my review of episode 4!

After Nightfall Season 2 Episode 3

Spoilers are below with no shame whatsoever.

While I’m well aware that After Nightfall doesn’t name their episodes, if the creators can give me the rather awesome nickname ‘Superfan’,  I can name inanimate web series. I’m calling this installment Momentum, for reasons that will soon become dazzlingly clear.

We open on a hilariously upbeat dinner with Dave, Quintin, Amaia and Leanne (who’s still not popular), when Brad enters and announces he’s out of the deal. Apparently he’s more afraid of Zara than Dave (hehe) and nobody is pleased about this.

On the other side of town (possibly?)  Angela has been drinking again and gone to visit her ex husband. Their interaction is…how can I put this? If this was a rom-com I’d be predicting a reunion. Jokes aside, there’s a history here. And whether or not we learn anything about it remains to be seen. But for the record, I’d like to know more.

Meanwhile a devastated Hayden is compiling a suspect list complete with motivations, and Zara visits Ursula for a tarot card reading. Apparently her new job isn’t going to be as easy as she thinks (I wonder who could have predicted that?).

At conversion camp we see with great relief (or was that just me?) that Nathan appears to have survived his shock “treatment” relatively unscathed. OK, physically he seems alright but psychologically? That’s season 3 AND the epilogue. But he has a new roommate, a terrified young girl named Daisy. And no, you’re not imagining the double meaning behind the words “Enjoy your new roommate!” Please God, let the kids revolt or escape or something. This conversion camp is sickening and the fact that they exist in the real world is beyond horrifying.

In the last episode Justine was visited by Brenda, a TV psychic who claims Troy sent her. And I am immediately calling BS for several reasons.

1. She claims Troy is talking to her. Troy hasn’t even talked to his Dad. He did say a few words to Viv in Episode 5 of Season 1 but that’s literally it and we never heard them.

2. We can’t see Troy in this scene, yet she says Troy is there. Whenever Troy’s ghost is there we sure as hell know about it.

3. From the production photos we saw while Season 2 was being filmed, there’s going to be a seance. And Brenda is nowhere to be seen. But we did get an image of Troy glaring at her while she’s apparently talking to Colin in what I assume is next weeks episode. Call me an obsessive overanalyser but this is what I think. I guess we’ll see what happens next.

And now comes the moment we were waiting for. Colin finally confronts Oscar, but is interrupted by a frantic text from Isobel. And finally, Faye wakes up in the hospital.

Why do I call this episode Momentum? Because the build up is reaching breaking point. There’s a new sergeant who knows what she’s doing and wants to crack down on corruption. Dave’s gang no longer has any shield from the police. Hayden and Colin have teamed up and they’re not going to back down. That much is clear. There’s nothing more powerful than someone with nothing left to lose, and Colin fits that description to a T. He’s not going to tolerate timewasters and he won’t let anything stand in his way.  Nathan has potential allies at the camp and if they work together, as I highly suspect they will, they have a chance to get out. There’s still so much we don’t know about Isobel, Leanne, Wesley and the rest of the McCleaveys. That includes Troy. Oscar has been exposed to several people now, and with Faye regaining consciousness I can’t see any way out for him. Mystery upon mystery, so many subplots in a very complicated story that need to be resolved.

Which is why before next week’s episode, I’m going to be doing an interlude blog. This will be a cohesive, in-depth look at the suspects, clues and potential red herrings. So dear readers, if you don’t mind I will leave you here as I have to go re-watch the entire series so far. Poor me.

Although before I go, there’s one tiny thing I wish we’d gotten in this episode. And that’s Colin giving Oscar a black eye. Regardless of whether he’s the killer or not, the guy is a complete freak of nature. I would have been just fine with that. But with that said, we have five more episodes to go and I’m sure at least one punch will be thrown by the end.

The arts will survive

Last week I published an article about the recent cuts to funding for creative courses. When I wrote it, it was mainly to get my anger and frustration out on paper, and maybe inspire some emails to the feedback line. What I did not expect was the reaction my writing had.

Within days, it had gone viral in the arts community, shared more than 10,000 times on Facebook alone. My phone was constantly buzzing with new comments, shares, messages from people who had read it, and requests for interviews from reporters. I could barely keep up and was completely overwhelmed that my writing was resonating with people to this degree.
But I wasn’t done there. At the same time, I was frantically emailing the feedback line, and sending emails to my local member and the Minister for Education himself. It took a few days, but I did hear back from him (or his assistant), and I’d like to share with you what I received.

First, my email.

Dear Senator

I am a 24 year old actress working in all aspects of the industry. in light of your recent announcement to VET fee help cuts for creative courses, I would respectfully request that you do not go ahead with the bill.
To say you only wish to help ‘legitimate’ students is highly insulting to us as a whole. Have you ever enjoyed a film, a television show or seen a live performance? Have you ever marvelled at graphic design, or heard a piece of music you liked? Then you sir, have enjoyed the arts. And if you take away more funding, you will contribute to its continual destruction.
The arts of all descriptions are not a ‘lifestyle choice’ as you have claimed. Technically speaking, all careers are a lifestyle choice including the one you have chosen. By this logic I shouldn’t have to repay my current VET fee help debt for my Diploma in Music Theatre because I was not a ‘legitimate student’. But I know that won’t happen. These continual cuts to the arts by your government is what makes finding work hard. 
The arts is the very fabric of society. We hold a mirror up to the world, cause people to think and dream and in a lot of cases, re-examine themselves and become better people. By taking away VET fee help, you will be removing jobs from educators and taking away opportunities for talented individuals. Under these proposals only the very wealthy will be able to pursue their gifts. How in the world will this ‘encourage study’, as you claim? 
The arts teaches empathy, humanity and acceptance of all. We pour our hearts and souls into our work and we do it with the majority of the world fighting us tooth and nail every step of the way. 
Please take a few minutes to read my blog on the matter. 
I thank you for your consideration and welcome any response.
In response, I received this email. I’ve also attached a screenshot (with personal information blacked out for obvious reasons)
Dear Miss (Name)
Thankyou for your email of 17 October 2016 to Senator the Hon Simon Birmingham, Minister for Education and Training, concerning the exclusion of the Arts from the eligible course list. I have been asked to reply on the Minister’s behalf.
While I appreciate your concerns, the Australian government has a responsibility to ensure that tax payer’s money is well directed and spent in a way that offers the greatest benefit to the Australian community. To this end, access to VET Student Loans will be restricted to courses that have a high national priority, meet industry needs, contribute to addressing skills shortages and align with strong employment outcomes. This will ensure the Government’s investment in vocational education and training is better targeted and large loan amounts are no longer paid for courses that have limited public good.
The eligible course list is available on the Department of Education and Training’s website at http://www.education.gov.au/vet−student−loans. Stakeholders are invited to provide feedback on the composition of the eligible course list. 
Feedback must be sent to VETStudentLoansPeducation.gov.au by 23 October 2016 and entitled ‘Feedback on the eligible course list’.
Please bear in mind that any proposals regarding VET Student Loans are subject to the passage through Parliament of the VET Student Loans Bill 2016.
Thank you for taking the time to write to the Minister.
2016-10-23 13.07.18.png
Do you need a minute after reading it? I know I did.
I don’t know how people can make it any plainer to the powers that be. But a few things are clear to me and anyone else with a functioning brain.

1. They have not thought this through.

“Limited public good”. That’s the words they used. That proves that they do not see the arts for what they truly are, and when it’s explained to them, they still do not see the value and probably wouldn’t until there was no art. They seem indifferent to being responsible for the decline of jobs and the value art brings to society.
Imagine a world with no movies, tv shows, radio, paintings, art galleries, designs, jewellery, graphics, musicals, plays, music, anything creative. You can stop imagining now. I know I can’t bear to think of it for more than a few seconds. There’s little doubt in my mind that society would soon cease to function as it does. As I said, without art, life has no meaning.
Imagine for a moment that the government called sports a ‘lifestyle choice’ and referred to it as an illegitimate occupation.

angrymob

Artists impression

There would be a riot. National outcry. Everyone would be disgusted. Because in this country sport is practically a religion. What if everyone in Australia could embrace the arts like they do the football? Or cricket? Or the Olympics? I suspect the country would be a much better place.
Several years ago Australian acting legend Tony Sheldon was up for a Tony Award for his performance in Priscilla Queen of the Desert. An Australian actor. An Australian musical based on a beloved Australian classic. He was up for  a TONY AWARD, the Oscars of theatre, and we did not hear one peep about it from the media.
What if a sports star was up for some award, for throwing pieces of leather around while a stadium screams for blood? We would hear nothing else for weeks.
Tony Sheldon, who I had the honour of meeting briefly during the 2013 run of Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, was playing Bernadette Bassenger, a transgender character so rarely seen and definitely in pop culture at that time. When’s the last time one of our own was up for a Tony Award? Why didn’t this honour get any attention? It was a tremendous achievement!

2. They are attempting to do good by attacking the wrong people.

The main reason these cuts are being made is allegedly to stop sub-par courses taking advantage of students. I want to make one thing very clear. I am not against the idea of this. What I am against is the disrespect shown to the arts and the fact that quality courses are inevitably going to get caught in the crossfires here. Places like the Actor’s Centre Australia. Founder Dean Carey has built this college up for nearly 30 years to bring arguably the finest acting course in the nation, as well as part time courses, workshops and drop-in classes for working actors. Hugh Jackman himself graduated from here and is the proud patron.
I do not understand why genuinely good courses are going to be penalised. Furthermore, the people in charge of this decision have not consulted a single person in the industry itself while ultimately deciding the fate of so many. What is wrong with these politicians?

Colleges are going to have to rework their courses and get extra credentials in order to keep going and make the courses affordable. Educators are going to suffer. Students are going to suffer. The industry will suffer.

But we will not fall.

At the risk of sounding over-dramatic, the arts will survive. They survived the Holocaust and Soviet Russia. They survive communism and fascism. They survive indifference and disrespect. They survive budget cuts and limited funding. Because at the end of the day, art is what makes the world a better place.
The bill will likely pass parliament, and we will have to regroup. And we will. We will find a way forward until people see the light. Nothing lasts forever. And as long as artists push ahead with what they do, breaking the barriers and holding a mirror up to society, we will win.

Because

“Art is not what you see, but what you make others see” – Edgar Degas

“The purpose of art is washing the dust of daily life off our souls…The artist is a receptacle for emotions that come from all over the place: from the sky, from the earth, from a scrap of paper, from a passing shape, from a spider’s web,” -Pablo Picasso

“It is through art, and through art only, that we can realise our perfection.” – Oscar Wilde

“Layer by layer art strips life bare,” – Robert Musil

I just wonder how much longer it will take for those blind politicians to see art for what it is.

So, we artists are no longer ‘legitimate’.

I haven’t been this furious in a long time, and I’m loathe to use my blog to comment on politics. But not today. With the recent announcement that our fearless leader plans to scrap student loans to creative courses, this might be the angriest blog I will ever write and I am not even sorry.

By all means, if you don’t know about this outrage, click here and feel your blood pressure skyrocket. Go ahead. I’ll wait.

Finished?

Now where the hell do I begin?

The Minister for Education and Training says that this is a “lifestyle choice”. Well guess what buddy? ALL CAREERS ARE A LIFESTYLE CHOICE, INCLUDING POLITICS. That’s right kids, follow your dreams, pursue your gifts and talents, but don’t even think about the creative side of life, that’s just a hobby.

The Minister goes on to say that “VET Student Loans will only support legitimate students to undertake worthwhile and value-for-money courses at quality training providers,”

Excuse me while I go throw up.

hadesrage

The gloves are coming off, pal.

So, we artists are not “legitimate students.”
Our profession will not “benefit Australia economically”.
You want to “encourage students to study”….by taking away opportunities for the next Hugh Jackman, Jackie Weaver or Tony Sheldon, to name a few?

First of all, do you have any idea how economically viable the arts are? Of course not, because you’re far more interested in raising your own salaries, spending millions on detention centres and giving the sports industry every cent they crave. You made even MORE cuts to hundreds of art forms recently, in turn GETTING RID OF VALUABLE JOBS and that STILL isn’t enough for you. Now you turn your blowtorch onto students, universities and educators (yeah, remember them?) who are the ones that are going to pay for your disgusting arrogance.
To call us not ‘legitimate students isn’t just offensive. It’s not just insulting. It is an affront to our whole profession. And yes, it IS a profession, despite what the naysayers bray.

By your logic, I don’t need to repay my current student debt for my Diploma of Music Theatre, because in your mind, I wasn’t a real student. That would make my life a hell of a lot easier as I audition in a world of star casting and the never ending cuts to my industry made by you idiots. Sorry, I can’t even be polite about this. They are dragging the very soul of society, because that is exactly what the arts are.
So we aren’t legitimate. We don’t contribute to society, you say?
Tell that to the acting students who spend hours upon hours after classes are done every single day on pieces of theatre which can cause people to re-examine their entire lives.
Tell that to the actors who learn empathy and human behaviour by creating characters. Tell that to the painters who pour their hearts into their artworks. Tell that to the makers of the film Blood Diamond, who used the film medium to draw attention to the issue of the diamond trade and caused a worldwide demand for conflict free diamonds. Tell that to the dancers who work their bodies into oblivion doing pointe work. Tell that to the cruise ship performers who uproot their entire lives for 6-9 months at a time, often relocating to the other side of the world just to bring joy to others. Tell that to the musicians who invest years into their chosen instruments, getting calluses and vocal fatigue so they can perform at your stupid political events, and often for free.

And tell that to me, a 24 year old actress two years out of studying who just completed an eight month contract performing theatre in education in schools around the country. Oh yeah, did you forget? Art teaches people. In this case, I was fighting the bullying epidemic on the front lines. Talk about how ‘illegitimate’ my work is to the children who came up to me after these shows in tears, saying that they now could see that they had the power to stop bullying, or sharing their stories of abuse with me.
But my work is a ‘lifestyle choice’, according to you, Minister for Education. Hilarious how as a minister for education, you are doing everything in your power to prevent it. You honestly think it’s easy, memorising 9, yes, nine different plays to perform on any given day, at any given time, in any possible combination, in any possible location at a moment’s notice? Nobody expects you to memorise every ridiculous speech you give. I’d like to see you political bigwigs educate children through theatre without talking down to them. Let’s watch as you keep your energy at the right level, never let it drop, all the while being focused on the story, your co-actor and the audience. All the while you have to be entertaining so they don’t lose focus, but never let it get out of hand and always, always, always focusing on delivering your message in a way they can interpret and apply to their own lives. And I am able to do this because of the training I received. Which was only possible because of VET fee help.
At the same time, I was constantly away from my home. My family. My partner. My dogs. My world. I put a lot of things in my life on hold because I believed in the message I was being paid to spread. To hear this utter BS about how this is not ‘legitimate’ causes more rage than I can describe.

And what about the other sides of the industry? Like theatre and musical theatre, some of the most underrated arts forms in existence. Why is it that we only ever seem to get the same old revivals of Annie and The Lion King? The masterpiece that is Next to Normal, about mental illness, was pulled just weeks before it was due to premiere in Sydney. It was cast, rehearsed, designed. How many productions will need to get cancelled of Jekyll and Hyde before we finally see it? Why was the Imported Artist Agreement not renewed, taking away opportunities for Australian artists? The current production of Aladdin has two Broadway performers. My Fair Lady brought people from the West End. Other productions like Wicked and Anything Goes cast non-actors in lead roles. Several years ago, while exceptional performers were on call for roles in Rocky Horror, the producers sought to cast people with at least 10,000 Twitter followers. No joke.

Of course, Matilda is doing very well. “Matilda is just what Australian musical theatre needs!” all the reviews crowed. But let’s look a little closer. Matilda, written in 2010, premiered on the West End in 2011. It’s written by the great Tim Minchin. By the way, he’s Australian. It’s based on a beloved book and movie, and was a smash hit in both London and on Broadway.

Why did it take five years to come to Australia?

Seriously, think about it. Tim Minchin is an iconic figure in our ever-shrinking arts industry. Matilda is by Roald Dahl, one of the number 1 children’s authors out there. Nearly every kid has read the book or seen the movie. From a business point of view, there’s pretty much no way in the world it could fail. And leaving the financial side out of it, this is still a fantastic piece.
Nobody in this country outside of our industry seems willing to bring out new and exciting theatre. Or heaven forbid, invest in our OWN pieces. Ever heard of The Hatpin? Or LoveBites? Yes, those are two wonderful contemporary Australian musicals you’ve never heard of.
When a successful Broadway/West End production finally jogs sweatily behind the bandwagon and arrives on our shores years later, it’s normally an exact replica of the original stagings.We’re rarely allowed to direct freely or come up with original designs. Of course we get the odd exception. Like my old nemesis Love Never Dies. Remember that trainwreck of a show? You know, the show Broadway rejected? The one that’s STILL not gone anywhere? The one with a terrible script, and insults the audience and characters every second? Millions of dollars were burned into trying to make that show worth looking at. Hundreds of invited, and non-paying patrons flooded into the Capitol Theatre and patted themselves on the back for supporting the arts, when every waking minute seems bent on destroying the entire industry. And I have just about reached my breaking point.

Of course, we have independent theatre companies like Squabbalogic and Sport for Jove, truly brilliant companies that bring exciting, fresh and innovative theatre. But they struggle for funding.

Where’s the government support for them, if they are so brilliant? It’s nowhere. And it’s independent theatre that’s saving the industry right now.

We pour our hearts and souls into our work and we do it all with the majority of the world patting us condescendingly on the head and saying “Isn’t that cute?”
We do it every day knowing we are setting ourselves up for rejection. We do it knowing that we are being critiqued on our looks and marketability. We do it knowing there is no guarantee of success. We do it knowing our country’s government and culture is fighting us tooth and nail every step of the way. But we do it because that one “yes” makes it all worth it. We do it because we believe in the arts. We do it because we’re courageous and make the hard choices that society needs to keep moving. We do it because we want to make a hat, where there never was a hat. We do it because without the arts, life has no meaning. And you are selling everything we do short.

Before I wrap up, I want to plead with everybody in the industry, and everyone who loves the arts to flood the email feedback line with emails. We have GOT to fight this. Contact the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA). Don’t take this lying down. It’s time to stand up for the industry because without us, we wouldn’t have one. Click this link (VETStudentLoans@education.gov.au) and let loose at them. We only have until October 23rd.
Let’s begin.